You’re underpaid” is rarely about skill alone
We plotted real roles on a 3D "salary cube" — and the pattern is uncomfortable. Two people can write the exact same code and earn 5× apart. The difference isn't talent. It's the other axes nobody teaches you to optimise: There is another factor/axis - #luck , and if you believe check https://retrograde.co.in Technical competence — table stakes, not the whole game Risk and Timings— commission sales & founders get paid in volatility Pedigree — an IIM tag alone shifts the band (earns like a senior engineer with half the tech depth) - Lot of influencers make stories and dont give this importance - but it is in real life and dont go with their success. Scarcity — cybersecurity & AI talent -comm and more simply because supply can't keep up Leverage and experience — does your output scale while you sleep? A quant's model and a founder's equity do. A data-entry seat doesn't. Salary = ƒ(competence · risk · pedigree · scarcity · leverage plus...